Lucky Number…Four

13 Mar

Can only four principles really save homeless animals and keep everyone safe?

Recently, I was lucky enough to meet Bill Bruce when he shared his Calgary Model to some of us animal welfare folks in NYC. Bruce oversees the Animal Services for the city of Calgary and is well respected in the animal welfare community. His philosophy and principles are simple, yet so effective. The Model advocates responsible pet ownership based on the following four principles:

  • License and provide permanent identification for pets.
  • Spay or neuter pets.
  • Provide training, physical care, socialization and medical attention for companion pets.
  • Do not allow pets to become a threat or nuisance in the community.

I can wax poetic about him and the model, but I think the numbers speak for themselves:

  • Calgary population: 1.1 million
  • Number of pet dogs: 110,000
  • Reported dog bites: less than 150 (50 being in-home incidents)
  • 90% of dogs are licensed.

And, the cherry on top of this sundae: his animal services agency is solely funded by licensing fees and other enforcement fees. What I truly love about this model is that it sets the owner up to succeed! How many times have I told dog owners that we need to set the dog up to succeed. Need a license, you can go up to any Animal Control Officer and get one on the spot. Fido leaps over the fence, if an AFO finds him and scans him, he will bring it back to your house for a nominal fee — no impoundment at all!

Bruce will admit: no documentation is needed to prove your dog is altered for your license application. However, if it is discovered that you lied, you will be fined $500! If the government is asking pet owners to follow some simple rules to keep everyone safe, it is only logical that the government enforce these laws. What’s more: all pet owners who license their pets receive an I Heart My Pets rewards card which offers discounts and deals from everything from pet services to travel accommodations. And, who doesn’t want a reward?

Here’s a little anecdote that shows if a system like this were in place in New York City, how we could keep even just one dog out of the pound.

Just this week, in my neighborhood, there was an incident of an offleash dog attacking another dog pretty severely (while it was next to its toddler human sibling). The attack was covered by a writer for DNAInfo, Carla Zanoni, whose column specifically addresses issues in the Inwood community, and I appreciate Carla’s piece for providing the straight facts and not sensationalizing the story.

In this case, the “attacking dog” was not wearing an ID tag, nor was it microchipped. This would also lead us to believe that the owner had not obtained the necessary license, which is all contrary to Bill Bruce’s first principle (“License and provide permanent identification for pets”).

Information is not given as to whether or not the “attacking dog,” who is female, is spayed or not. So let’s give the owner some credit and assume that she is indeed spayed. Check mark number one according to Bruce’s model, and the only one we’ll find throughout.

Principle number three specifically addresses socialization. It’s safe to say, I think, that the “attacking dog” probably hasn’t had much in the way of socialization with other dogs. However, there are some dogs who are just predisposed to not be social with other dogs, and if that is indeed the case, you should recognize that and take additional measures to make sure everyone stays safe.

And as for allowing the pet “to become a threat or nuisance in the community”? Well, I think the people of this community probably feel adequately threatened.

This story has brought up many neighborhood issues including offleash dogs, which can be a very heated issue. Leash laws are important and need to be in place to keep animals and people safe. No matter what the size or temperament of the dog. So, aside from critiquing the “attacking dog’s” owner for not being thoroughly responsible, the law enforcement is also at fault in this whole situation.

New York City dog license laws require every dog, while in public, to always be on a leash no longer than six feet long. This law is almost never enforced. The number of people we see daily walking dogs off leash, without tags, on 20 foot long retractable leashes, etc. is astounding.

If the laws are enforced properly in every instance where they are not being adhered to, as is shown by Bill Bruce’s Calgary Model, the number of dogs in homes could be exponentially greater than it is now, and maybe, just maybe, our city’s animal shelters wouldn’t be quite so crowded.

Advertisements

6 Responses to “Lucky Number…Four”

  1. Two Grads March 13, 2012 at 4:19 PM #

    Wow! What an eye-opening post!

  2. barbarajkennedy1014 March 14, 2012 at 4:13 PM #

    It is so reasonable, and makes so much sense. I hope people can appreciate how important this information is.

  3. Heartbeat-At-My-Feet March 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM #

    WOW congratulations on being picked up by StubbyDog! I’m so glad they did, because I must have missed this post, and it’s awesome! There’s a small group of advocates here in Nashville trying to work with our local Animal Control department to try to implement some changes. This is great information to have.

  4. pititpwasson March 26, 2012 at 2:36 PM #

    Obviously like many laws in NYC, the ones regarding pet licensing and leashing are all but useless if they are not enforced. However, enforcement is an issue of politics: in orders for laws to be enforced, there must be enough agents to enforce them, and in this economy “animal issues” are seen as far below other crimes. In order for a person to be “ticketed” for having a dog off leash, the policemen must SEE them off leash…which is unlikely given, for example, the amount of acreage in Prospect Park vs the number of police officers assigned to patrol it. We can’t get people to stop abandoning their animals there, much less always leashing, licensing, and cleaning up after their dogs.
    So while the Calgary Laws are useful, I’m going to guess that success in such a low amount of dog bites might also be due to the fact that it is a MUCH smaller city.

    Personally I think the only way things will improve is through community education and involvement. We see the neighbors that have their dogs off leash…do we say anything? Do we know if the dogs in our building are licensed? If they aren’t…why not?
    Expecting NYC to increase oversight on animal issues in this economy simply isn’t going to happen. I’m convinced this is an issue that dog and animal lovers need to address ourselves, in our own communities.

    • That Touch of Pit ... March 26, 2012 at 2:51 PM #

      You make amazing points. It’s absolutely true that due to economical issues, there is a smaller police presence in general. And of course, they have to prioritize different kinds of crime above others to ensure the greatest safety for everyone. And yes, for police to take action on almost anything, an officer has to see the crime happen with their own eyes – making enforcement almost impossible. HOWEVER, not entirely impossible.

      And you are 100% right about animal lovers needing to educate the people in our communities about responsible pet ownership. That is why we write this blog, after all. Blogs and websites like ours provide physical resources for people in the community so that we all can more effectively advocate for responsible pet ownership.

      In other words, we all need to do our part. Us, as citizens and animal lovers, but also the law enforcement. We can work together to make a change.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Lucky Number…Four : StubbyDog - March 26, 2012

    […] Leave a Comment By Jennifer Bristol and Josh Blye, reprinted with permission from That Touch of Pit […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: